Photo shows an R&G guard.and radiator guard from Evotech.
Photo shows an R&G guard.and radiator guard from Evotech.
Panzermann, you have much more experience with this bike than I do as a new owner of just nine months, but if I understand you correctly that is not the experience I have with the 2020 with Dynamic ESA and TFT (and associative software and electronics), so I can only assume that the previous 1200 iteration differs in that manner. They are not completely independent but rather a coordinated union under the umbrella of the selected riding mode (aside from the Dynamic Pro mode). The riding mode creates a default coordinated set of settings that work in "optimal" union...from the manual, after listing the various riding modes: "For each of these riding modes, there is a coordinated setting for the ABS and ASC/DTC systems as well as for the throttle response. The coordination of the Dynamic ESA also depends on the selected riding mode" (p. 148). ABS and/or ASC/DTC can be manually switched off in each riding mode, but they begin as a coordinated set for each riding mode. Also from the manual, after listing the riding modes: "The optimum interaction between engine characteristics, ABS control, and ASC/DTC control is provide for each of these scenarios" (p. 74). Once the ESA is set to Auto it adapts to the default optimal setting for each riding mode, e.g. stiffer from Dynamic and softer for Road, and that suspension mode change is not independent of the engine/throttle mode (Rain, Road, Dynamic) but rather part and parcel of it within the default Auto ESA component of the coordinated set of changes.Not so – ABS is either selected or not selected, independent of riding or suspension modes.
(as explained earlier) riding modes and suspension modes are completely independent. But you can easily set the combination you desire, albeit with three separate setting functions (Engine mode, suspension preload, and damping).
Fair call and it makes sense. I'm hopefully doing a track day this weekend just for a laugh. I normally race an R3, so the boxer will be a little different but it is good to find your limits on the track and keep within them on the road.I wouldn't go the way of Dougl's example, but my normal User mode is Road throttle response with Dynamic ASC/DTC.
The 1200-LC throttle response off zero is more sensitive than the 1250 (from the test ride I took) and my SC-Project end-can has made this more so, so Dynamic throttle can be a bit touchy when on bumpy roads – a mid-corner bump can result in a lurch off-line. But I'm happy to feel the back slip a bit powering out of corners without early ASC intervention (gives me a feel for traction) so on my User setting I have Road throttle response combined with Dynamic ASC/DTC.
The 1250's softer throttle response means I'd likely just leave the combination in the standard Dynamic setting.
Fair call and it makes sense. I'm hopefully doing a track day this weekend just for a laugh. I normally race an R3, so the boxer will be a little different but it is good to find your limits on the track and keep within them on the road.I wouldn't go the way of Dougl's example, but my normal User mode is Road throttle response with Dynamic ASC/DTC.
The 1200-LC throttle response off zero is more sensitive than the 1250 (from the test ride I took) and my SC-Project end-can has made this more so, so Dynamic throttle can be a bit touchy when on bumpy roads – a mid-corner bump can result in a lurch off-line. But I'm happy to feel the back slip a bit powering out of corners without early ASC intervention (gives me a feel for traction) so on my User setting I have Road throttle response combined with Dynamic ASC/DTC.
The 1250's softer throttle response means I'd likely just leave the combination in the standard Dynamic setting.
Sorry it was R&G. I ordered so much stuff at the same time I lost track. My bad.Photo shows an R&G guard.
Thanks ****. I am tending to agree with you! I loved the Speed triple, but I wouldn't like to do 3000km on it. The Tuono would be a great hooligan bike, but the fuelling for around town is shocking, and sadly we all have to do a bit of that riding. I am just in love with the torque. I have raced bikes most of my life, but still can't get over the gobs of torque this thing produces. Love it.Welcome to the forum smithy09The R1200/1250 s are probably the best real world bikes on the market.
Bold assumption RC 😄 – I am well experienced with the 1200 but with the 1250 I have to rely on the surrogates – rider manuals (there are numerous variations for different variants and markets) and press releases (don't trust journos – they're just as confused as we are!).you have much more experience with this bike than I do
Don't sell yourself short, my friend, I've learned a lot from your posts in the time I've been here.🙂Bold assumption RC 😄
Yes, correct -- for Rain, Road, and Dynamic riding modes unless you switch off the ABS and/or ASC/DTC (and not even sure that's possible with Rain, never tried), with a bit of customization possible in Dynamic Pro.From a user perspective, you take whatever is optimised by the Motorrad engineers, or turn ABS and/or ASC/DTC off.
Perhaps it's semantics or my misunderstanding of your full contention that's getting in the way, but on that we'll just have to agree to disagree...as per my experience and the manual, if one has the Dynamic ESA in Auto, it's going to automatically optimize the suspension for you in Rain, Road, and Dynamic in a coordinated fashion with everything else.I stand by my earlier points though that ESA settings (preload and separate damping control) are completely independent of Engine/ASC/DTC settings.
Concur, although there seems to be a general consensus that ideally ESA could be linked within the Dynamic Pro set up. Perhaps even a ABS/TC off setting as well - even if the bike reverted to Road or Dynamic when restarted to get around the safety liability....ESA settings (preload and separate damping control) are completely independent of Engine/ASC/DTC settings.
The quality is outstanding. I am waiting on two side panels but can see me investing in more bling. Ilmberger tell me they should be up to date by February.I really like the Carbon tank center and front fender. I've been waiting since spring for ilmberger to take my money on the rear hugger I ordered. I always loved riding the older boxer Rs, so I ended up buying my 1250 without a test ride, and I was petty happy to discover the all new top end hit. Have to agree that if BMW wants to enjoy super premium price levels they really ought to provide super premium adjustability in return.
No worries. Yeah I noticed, cos I bought the Evotech (their stuff is nice by the way) but it doesn’t fit if you have the plastic side pods, it only fits with the stainless ones. So, I sent it back and got the R&G one.Sorry it was R&G.
Actually on re-reading the 1250r manual, I agree. It is clear the ABS, ASC/DCT and Dynamic ESA are coordinated (“adapted”) with the selected riding mode....as per my experience and the manual, if one has the Dynamic ESA in Auto, it's going to automatically optimize the suspension for you in Rain, Road, and Dynamic in a coordinated fashion with everything else.
So far ilmberger has told me: end of summer, end of September, early December, and last time end of January MAYBE. I sure hope it's good after all the waiting.The quality is outstanding. I am waiting on two side panels but can see me investing in more bling. Ilmberger tell me they should be up to date by February.
I hope you're wrong, but who knows? Still waiting for cylinder head guards from R&G as well....So far ilmberger has told me: end of summer, end of September, early December, and last time end of January MAYBE. I sure hope it's good after all the waiting.
I'd be willing to pay even more for their front fender if they revised it to be a proper fender that extended down an extra maybe 15" to keep dirt where it belongs.
Perhaps it's semantics or my misunderstanding of your full contention that's getting in the way, but on that we'll just have to agree to disagree...as per my experience and the manual, if one has the Dynamic ESA in Auto, it's going to automatically optimize the suspension for you in Rain, Road, and Dynamic in a coordinated fashion with everything else.
OK, I'm with the program now, kind of. There are a couple very obtuse paragraphs in the manual that refer to this linkage – without explanation (maybe BMW is trying to protect their intellectual property – from the owners ...).Actually on re-reading the 1250r manual, I agree. It is clear the ABS, ASC/DCT and Dynamic ESA are coordinated (“adapted”) with the selected riding mode.
I suspect the riding mode doesn’t fully override the ESA setting, but just allows for a different working range.
Is it simply that when you select Rain or Road, the ESA defaults to Road, and when you select Dynamic or Dynamic Pro, ESA defaults to Dynamic, I wonder. A double tap on the the Spring rocker switch would swap to the alternative setting.So there must be some nuances in the ESA that are directly associated with the Ride Modes (scenarios) but their exact nature remains a mystery.
I can confirm that as I have a Speed Triple, it's a great bike to have fun on but not to go any serious distance, it's about the same as my Ducati in that respect.Thanks ****. I am tending to agree with you! I loved the Speed triple, but I wouldn't like to do 3000km on it. The Tuono would be a great hooligan bike, but the fuelling for around town is shocking, and sadly we all have to do a bit of that riding. I am just in love with the torque. I have raced bikes most of my life, but still can't get over the gobs of torque this thing produces. Love it.