Was the 05 R1200ST ahead of its time/misunderstood? I think it was both.
Attachments
-
254.2 KB Views: 544
I'm not a big fan of the looks, but the 'Wunderlich' front light frame as in post 2, with the divider certainly makes the front light look better.They were a great bike and nice looking until you looked at them front on...
I've always had 2 bikes, my old spare bike was a 1987 K100. If it was the only bike I had I would be happy with it but the performance difference between it and the R1200 is too big to enjoy it, if that makes sense. I've always liked the look of the ST, really!!!, but never thought I be able to afford one as my spare bike.Good on You, Dave !! They just keep on running and running.............This one belongs to a blogger in my biker club.
The engine technology has improved, but the protection is still very good.
Cost performance of a good used one is not bad at all.
Ahead of its time / misunderstood - neither, just ugly. I did read an interview with David Robb in which he said he would have killed it before birth had he got there soon enough. I'm sure it rode well enough, but I could never swing my leg over one.
Ahead of its time / misunderstood - neither, just ugly. I did read an interview with David Robb in which he said he would have killed it before birth had he got there soon enough. I'm sure it rode well enough, but I could never swing my leg over one.